Item 2.123: Blow the Whistle on Fort Benning's UFO-E.T. Connection (a FOIA Request)

TO:  Commander
        U. S. Army Infantry Center and Fort Benning
        ATTN:  Freedom-of-Information Officer (IMSE-BEN-HRS)
        7210 Dixie Road
        Fort Benning, GA  31905

FROM:  Larry W. Bryant
             3518 Martha Custis Drive
             Alexandria, VA  22302

DATE:  August 31, 2011

1.  Reference:  my classified advertisement now posted at http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5703490.htm , the text of which is reprinted below.

2.  This freedom-of-information request, which I submit as a representative of the news media (RNM - principally as a columnist for the newsstand periodical UFO Magazine), seeks from your command a photocopy of the following records:

     a.  Any and all UFO-related serious-incident reports emanating from and/or processed by any Benning-based personnel during the period August 31, 2009, through August 31, 2011; any and all investigative documentation pertaining to those reports (to include intelligence analyses, law-enforcement actions taken, inspector-general involvement, medical responses, and chaplain consultations);

     b.  Any and all reporting directives, standing operating procedures, intelligence-collection requirements, alien-contact-protocol documents, and public affairs guidance as regards UFO encounters experienced by/witnessed by any Benning personnel.

3.  Please acknowledge my RNM-requester status by waiving all records-search/review fees incident to your fulfilling this request; and please note my willingness to pay for only your reasonable document-duplication costs beyond the first 100 pages.  Ample evidence of my RNM status appears within my web log at http://ufoview.posterous.com .

4.  By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for UFO Magazine

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine

Chief of Staff, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

TEXT OF LWB's ADVERTISEMENT POSTED AT http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5703490.htm

== Blow the Whistle on the Fort Benning-UFO-E.T. Connection ! ==

Word has come to me that the UFO-E.T. presence in or near the U. S. Army Infantry Center at Fort Benning, Georgia, that peaked in the late 1970s still makes itself known to soldiers and civilians throughout the region.  Why is this so; and in what interaction are certain Army officials engaging, behind the scenes, with that presence?  To help determine the answers, I'm submitting a freedom-of-information request to Benning's commander (see its text now posted as Item 2.123 of my blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com ).  Meantime, if you (or someone you know) possess any insider information/contacts/leads pertaining to the Army's role (past/present/future) in the official coverup of the UFO-E.T. experience, please contact me at:  Larry W. Bryant, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA  22302; phone:  703-931-3341; e-mail:  overtci@cavtel.net .  Whatever you choose to share at this time might erase the gap between a fully knowledgeable public and a public arbitrarily denied access to what lies behind Benning's curtain of UFO-E.T. secrecy.

Item 2.122: What UFO-E.T. Mother Lode Lies Behind the FAA's FOIA Curtain?

[LWB Note:  Not known for being overly friendly to FOIA requesters, the U. S. Federal Aviation Administration lately seems disinclined to change its stance, despite Pres. Obama's avowed policy of "open government" responsiveness.  A case study in this managerial disconnect emerges from the following impasse reported by guest blogger William McNeff, who thereby joins the ranks of the FOIA-scorned.  He tells me that a FAA regional staff has failed to comply with the FOIA's time limit of 20 working days in which to begin processing his July 17, 2011, request, as reprinted below.  Does this official nonfeasance mean that certain FAA funds used for generating and housing the sought-for records now are being diverted toward arbitrarily denying public access to that taxpayer-funded material?  If so, whether or not you be associated with the Mutual UFO Network, you as a citizen should be outraged by such official subversion of the spirit and the letter of the U. S. Freedom of Information Act.  I suggest that you express that outrage by writing to your congressmember with the request that (s)he look into, and help you remedy, this egregious attack upon greater UFO-E.T. freedom of information and accountability (UFOIA).  In the meantime, I'm posting, below McNeff's letter, my whistleblower-solicitation advertisement now circulating at http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5673512.htm .]

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= TEXT OF MR. MCNEFF's JULY 17, 2011, LETTER TO THE FAA =

TO:   Ms. Mary Kay Howlett, FOIA Coordinator
          FAA Great Lakes Region, AGL-30
          2300 E. Devon Avenue
          Des Plaines, IL 60018

FROM:   William McNeff 
                2605 Highland Drive
                Burnsville, MN  55337

DATE:  July 17, 2011                                                                                                                                           

     

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request(5 U.S.C. 552)

 

Dear Sir or Madam:

 

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. I am an Assistant State Director for MUFON Minnesota, a non-profit organization, and I am conducting this investigation solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research.  The fee category should be classified as an educational or noncommercial scientific organization. I am willing to pay up to $50 for this request for the cost of duplication, after the first 100 pages as per the FOIA. If fees will exceed this amount, please contact me first.

 

All requests for information are related to the time period of 01:30 hrs to 2:30 hrs Central Daylight Time on July 13, 2011.  Unidentified aerial objects were reported at approximately 01:45 hrs over Maple Grove and at 02:20 hrs over Plymouth.  This request is being made of the FAA's Farmington, Minnesota Traffic Control Center. I request a review of the following document(s) and release of copies to me of those documents as described below:

 

1.      Copies of radar images, preferably in a CD using ASCII or Excel format, from all primary and secondary surveillance radar located within 100 miles of Farmington, Minnesota, during the above mentioned time period.

2.      To the extent allowable by law, a copy of the model type of radars controlled by the Farmington Air Route Traffic Control Center and their locations.

 

I understand that radar tapes or recordings are often erased after 30 days from date of recording. I respectfully request that no radar tapes or recordings be erased that were recorded by radar stations within 100 miles of Farmington, Minnesota between 01:30 hrs to 02:30 hrs Central Daylight Time on July 13, 2011.

 

Thank you for your time and consideration.

 

Sincerely,

 

William McNeff

Assistant State Director

MUFON Minnesota

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

== TEXT OF OF LWB's ADVERTISEMENT POSTED AT http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5673512 ==

 

== Blow the Whistle on the FAA's Attack upon UFOIA! ==

Has the FOIA-flouting U. S. Federal Aviation Administration begun competing with the FOIA factotums at the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency, the U. S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the U. S. Department of the Air Force, the U. S. Secret Service, the U. S. National Reconnaissance Office, et al., for the dubious distinction of Most Unresponsive Agency in matters relating to greater UFO-E.T. freedom of information and accountability (UFOIA)?  Well, if you can judge by UFO researcher William McNeff's July 17, 2011, FOIA request to the FAA Great Lakes Region's office, that question answers itself - since, as of this writing, no FAA FOIA official has bothered to respond to the request within the 20-working-day period mandated by the Act.  Why does the FAA feel so threatened by UFOtruth that it's willing to risk being scolded/fined by any federal judge called upon to adjudicate this case?  The July 13, 2011, incident in question consists of an early-morning UFO encounter by two women returning home from a party near Minneapolis.  They managed to videotape at least two mysterious craft.

For the text of McNeff's July 17, 2011, FOIA request, see Item 2.122 of my blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com .  Meantime, if you (or someone you know) can shed light on the incident itself and/or on the FAA's (illegal) decision to stonewall McNeff's request, please contact me as follows:  Larry W. Bryant, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA  22302; phone:  703-931-3341; e-mail:  overtci@cavtel.net .

Item 2.121: FOIA Request to the U. S. Postal Service (re Its Collection of UFO-encounter Reports from USPS Personnel)

TO: Director
U. S. Postal Service
ATTN: Freedom-of-Information Coordinator
475 L'Enfant Plaza - Room 5821
Washington, DC 20260-5821

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302

DATE: August 24, 2011

1. Reference: my classified advertisement posted at http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5516951.htm - the text of which is printed below.

2. This FOIA request seeks your mandatory release of all USPS-generated/housed records pertaining to the following subject matter:

a. Any and all records of UFO encounters experienced by/reported by any USPS personnel during the period Jan. 1, 2009, through Aug. 24, 2011 (regardless of whether these personnel were on active duty at the time of their reported encounters) - said records to include incident reports created/tracked by the U. S. Postal Inspection Service, witness statements, photographic evidence, inter-agency coordination-and-review documents, executive correspondence, faxed documentation, memoranda for record, memoranda of telephone conversations, document-transmittal slips, e-mail messages, temporary-duty reports, investigative narratives, physical-trace evidence, threat estimates, and briefing papers/talking points/charts;

b. Any and all USPS policy documents, standing-operating-procedure guidance, and reporting directives pertaining to the USPS collection of its personnel's encounters with/sightings of unidentified flying objects, "flying saucers," "flying triangles," alien spacecraft, vehicular interference from proximity to such craft, and abduction of USPS personnel by entities associated with these craft.

3. Since I submit this request as a representative of the news media (RNM), principally as a columnist for the newsstand periodical UFO Magazine, I ask that you acknowledge my RNM-requester status by waiving all records-search/review fees incident to your processing this request; accordingly, I hereby express my willingness to pay only the cost of your document-duplication process (starting after the first (free) 100 pages of said duplication). NOTE: ample documentation of my RNM status appears on my web log - http://ufoview.posterous.com .

4. By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for UFO Magazine

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine
Chief of Staff, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
TEXT OF LWB's ADVERTISEMENT POSTED AT http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5516951

== Blow the Whistle on the U. S. Postal Service's Collection of UFO-encounter Reports from Its Personnel ! ==


Recently, a whistleblower has revealed that a cache of UFO-encounter reports from USPS personnel lies behind a curtain of secrecy within one or more USPS components. How critical to the public's UFO-E.T-awareness quotient has this cache been during the past few years? What other federal agencies know about, and have unfettered access to, the reports' case files and to their evaluation/exploitation? To help answer these questions (and more), I'm sending a freedom-of-information request to USPS headquarters for a copy of some of the case files; see the request's text posted as Item 2.121 of my blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com .

Meantime, if you (or someone you know) can corroborate/augment the whistleblower's account, please contact me at: Larry W. Bryant, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302; phone: 703-931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net .

Item 2.120: Follow-up to My FOIA Request of June 28, 2011, to CIA (See Item 2.113)

TO:  MS. Susan Viscuso
        Freedom of Information Coordinator
        U. S. Central Intelligence Agency
        Washington, DC  20505

FROM:  Larry W. Bryant
             3518 Martha Custis Drive
             Alexandria, VA  22302

DATE:  August 20, 2011

Within a few days of e-creating my above-cited 28 Jun 11 FOIA request for a copy of, inter alia, the late CIA official James Jesus Angelton's "Assessment No. 7," I also sent to your office, via USPS mail, a signed printout of that letter (whose text is published as Item 2.113 of my blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com ).

Now that more than 20 working days have transpired since my issuing that request, and since I've yet to receive any response to it from your office, I wonder whether you've actually received its USPS-mailed version.  If you did receive it, would you please tell me when I can expect your office to complete the full processing of my request?

If by nonresponding to my request within the U. S. Freedom of Information Act's 20-working-day response-time limit you're intending to defy your statutory obligation, then I hereby serve notice that you now have 12 days from the date of this e-letter to comply fully with my request.  Absent any compliant response from you during that period, I shall seek all the judicial relief afforded me by the act's punitive provisions (to include my seeking your agency's reimbursement of my attorney's fees).

LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for UFO Magazine

P.S.:  I'm USPS-mailing to you a signed printout of this e-formatted follow-up.

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine

Chief of Staff, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
== TEXT OF LWB's 28 Jun 11 FOIA Request to CIA ==

TO:  Director
        U. S. Central Intelligence Agency
        ATTN:  Freedom-of-Information Coordinator
        Washington, DC  20505

FROM:  Larry W. Bryant
              3519 Martha Custis Drive
              Alexandria, VA  22302

DATE:  June 28, 2011

1.  Reference:  My classified advertisement posted athttp://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad4843340.htm , the text of which is printed below.

2.  This FOIA request, which I submit as a representative of the news media, seeks from your agency a photocopy of the following records:

     a.  Mr. Angleton's "Assessment No. 7";

     b.  Any and all CIA-housed reports, analyses, correspondence, briefing papers/charts, memoranda for record, minutes of meetings, staff studies, project protocols, policy documents, intelligence estimates, and funding authorizations pertaining to the personnel-exchange program cited in the above-referenced ad.

3.  Please note that provisions of the U. S. Freedom of Information Act (as amended by the Open Government Act of 2007) entitle me, in my RNM-requester status, to automatic waiver of all records-search/review fees incident to your fulfilling this request.  Accordingly, I am willing to pay only for your (reasonable) document-reproduction expenses in this matter.

4.  By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for the newsstand periodical UFO Magazine

Copies furnished to:

    Editor, UFO Magazine

    Chief of Staff, Select Committee on Intelligence, U. S. Senate
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

TEXT OF LWB's ADVERTISEMENT POSTED AT:http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad4843340.htm

== Blow the Whistle on the CIA's Suppression of the Angleton Report (and Win up to $2k) ! ==

Recently, a former U. S. military intelligence officer blew the whistle on the existence (and CIA suppression) of a 1970 counterintelligence assessment of the UFO-E.T. phenomenon, as prepared by the late CIA official James Jesus Angleton.  Titled "Assessment No. 7," the report mentions a personnel-exchange program conducted between designated "extraterrestrial biological entities" and a cadre of U. S. officials in 1965 and 1969.  This revelation may account for the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency's continued collection of certain UFO-encounter reports, to this very day.  Assuming that some form of the exchange program continues as well, how much is it costing the taxpayers, and how cost-effective has it been?  What role have such private contractors as the Rand Corporation played in the program (and why)?  Who are the U. S. Navy personnel that have been assigned to the program, and what has been their mission and duties?  What agency has been controlling/exploiting any alien technology derived from the program?  What treaty/trade agreement exists between them and us, and where are the records of that arrangement?  To what extent (if any) has Congress been overseeing the program?

If you (or someone you know) can help provide verifiable answers to those questions, you may qualify for a cash reward of up to $2,000 - the individual amount to be determined, on a case-by-case basis, by an ad hoc panel of UFO-oriented specialists.  Please send your relevant tips/leads/contacts/documentation (including deathbed confessions) to me, as follows:  Larry W. Bryant, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA  22302; phone:  703-931-3341; e-mail:  overtci@cavtel.net .

Your whistleblowership in this (eternal?) quest for UFO-E.T. truth may well facilitate the processing of my relevant freedom-of-information request to the CIA (posted as Item 2.113 of my blog - http://ufoview.posterous.com ).  For updates on this pursuit, you may wish to subscribe for my free e-newsletter at http://tinyletter.com/ufoview-updates .

Item 2.119: Don't Burn UFOlit (or Its Owners) at the Stake!

 [LWB Note:  this commentary responds to the "UFO Iconoclast(s)" blog entry at http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2011/08/addiction-ufologists.html , which labels hoarding of UFO literature a "pathological" pursuit -- and which, by inference, marginalizes both this genre of literature and its serious collectors.]

Killing the messenger of "bad news" (i.e., the news that UFOlit warrants being hoarded, protected, and promoted) disserves the public's stakeholdership in helping resolve one of the greatest mysteries confronting humankind.

As one of the world's premier, unabashed lifetime hoarders of UFOlit - whether it be in English or not - I resent being labeled "pathological" in my passion for preserving/expanding my own collection, and for encouraging others to do the same.

After all, hasn't my collection unselfishly led to publication of my first book (UFO Politics at the White House: Citizens Rally 'round Jimmy Carter's Promise, whose second, expanded edition of 2005 remains available from Galde Press)? And, for that matter, hasn't my far-smaller collection of books on hypnotism and reincarnation led (even more directly) to Galde's 2007 publication of my second book (Conjuring Gretchen: The Saga of Virginia's Preacher-Hypnotist)? To be sure, my third category of ("pathological") book-collecting consists of tomes on the art/craft of writing - which has led to last year's publication of my very first work of fiction - a Fortean novella cast as a memoir, titled Conjoined: The Story of Rex and Roxanne - The World's First Androgynous Siamese Twins ( http://www.booklocker.com/books/4829.html ).

Some of my fellow collectors know that my UFOlit collection includes every issue of the late Ray Palmer's Flying Saucers magazine, dating back to June 1957; two issues, I immodestly note, possess even more collectibility because of a couple of my own articles therein. Back in the mid-1960s, I embarked on a project to compile an annotated bibliography of the periodical's entire editorial contents, becoming, alas, sidetracked by employment obligations. Pangs of conscience still nag me to resurrect that effort; but who'd buy that product except a few other "pathological" collectors - and perhaps the library at Roswell's UFO museum?

I also proudly own a copy of every issue of UFO Magazine's 20-some-year run. But how could I ever produce an annotated bibliography of that mass of material? Incidentally, on the collector's market, some of the earliest issues of UFO Magazine can command more than $30 apiece. Recently, I learned that a single issue of the 1960s-era mimeographed newsletter UFO Commentary had fetched more than $20. Of course, I have a copy of every issue, whose then-teen-aged publisher-editor since has become a professional publisher. Will collectors start paying more than 20 to 30 dollars apiece for UFO Commentary when they discover that a few issues contain articles from UFOfreak Larry W. Bryant?

For nearly 55 years, I've continued to hoard artifacts of Earth's UFO-research subculture, remaining committed to passing on that enduring wealth of material to the posterity of creative, curious, and probing newcomers. On the shelves of my UFO library repose copies of several UFO-related Ph.D. dissertations and master's theses - all standing tall in their non-recycled paper as if testifying to their resistance against any marginalization. Their value will continue to grow both in their academic content and in their marketability to collectors.

If hoarders of UFOlit deserve to be labeled pathological, then how about collectors of baseball cards, comic books, science fiction novels, pocketknives, Barbie dolls, etc? Most of these people may be possessed merely by the collectors gene rather than by a destructive demon, doncha know?

Now, speaking of pathology, maybe it's time I tell you about my fourth category of serious collectorship: the memoirs of ex-mental hospital patients, a subgenre of personal narrative dating back to the early 1900s. My collection, begun in the early 1960s, now numbers in the dozens. Lately, they've been begging me, after a 40-year hiatus, to resume cataloguing them for a book-length, annotated bibliography focusing on their literary value. - Larry W. Bryant (18 Aug 11)

Item 3.17: UFO-NASA Collusion Amidst the 1960s-Era Cape Canaveral?

[LWB Note:  the following installment of "Bryant's UFO View" column originally appeared in the June 2009 issue (No. 150) of UFO Magazine.]

UFO-NASA Collusion Amidst the 1960s-Era Cape Canaveral?


     By Larry W. Bryant

       These days, armed with a computer and with one's choice of a print-on-demand publisher, anyone swiftly can become a bookwright (or, I suppose, a playwright).  

       Such an author seems able to dismiss the editorial salability of the work so long as (s)he can focus its pages more on getting something off his/her chest than on offering something new/entertaining/motivational.  Thus, we have JE Oglesby's 140-page tome titled Proof of Extraterrestrial Intelligence:  The Cape Canaveral Apollo Program Chronicles (lulu.com -2008).

       Does this example of "citizen journalism" signify a permanent foothold in the craggy heights of modern ufology?  Perhaps so.  As our contemporary news media continue to lag behind the growing public interest in matters ufological, we'll no doubt see steady growth in treatments like Oglesby's.

       This memoir centers on his own December 30, 1967, nighttime sighting of two "flying saucers" during a visit to his brother-in-law's home in the rural town of Bithlo, several miles west of the U. S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida.  At the time of the event, the 27-year-old Oglesby was employed as a machine-shop clerk by the Bendix corporation, a NASA contractor.

       The impact of his first-ever UFO encounter transformed Oglesby into a hard-core skywatcher whenever he stayed overnight at his brother-in-law's home.  There, over a period of three months in early 1968 (in which he kept a journal to document events), the young man found his reward in a series of alleged alien-spacecraft sightings, some of which also were witnessed by other relatives, friends, and neighbors.  All these incidents occurred at night, as did a number of cases of vanishing/mutilated cattle from neighboring ranch land.

       On more than one occasion, he recounts, he had a chance to follow, on foot, a small, "flashing blue light" into a wooded area where it apparently had landed; but, alone in an unfamiliar, foreboding locale, he got cold feet and backtracked from his hike into the dense woods.  From his repeat encounter of February 17, 1968, we have his own words:

       "I allowed [once again] fear to gain the upper hand that night as I paused, sensing that something or someone had been watching me from a distance.  I reacted by a swift retreat back to the relative safety of my car."

       Certainly, no-one can fault Oglesby for letting fear of the unknown get the better of him.  Even today, what adult among us would be so bold as to venture out, alone at night, into a hostile environment to track down a mysterious airborne craft?  Many a sleep-deprived night became the price for his saga of expanded UFO awareness.

       As suitable for any such episodes of trauma (especially the one culminating (dramatically) in his "the big picture" of the UFO cover-up at Canaveral - which he titles "ETI Monitoring of Apollo Program Finishes at the Cape"), witness Oglesby uses the long passage of time to add just the right perspective to his chronicles.

       His down-to-earth, unpretentious prose (albeit plagued by faulty syntax, inexact punctuation, and typos) lets the reader decide for him-/herself as to its veracity and rationality.  One of those readers happens to be British ufologist Timothy Good, whose endorsement on the book's back cover pronounces:

       "I have no hesitation in recommending this most important book.  Jim Oglesby provides astonishing evidence linking the Apollo Program with extraterrestrial activity in Florida.  Many of these encounters - some including landed spacecraft - were witnessed with others.  I have long accepted that certain aliens have liaised with NASA personnel, specifically to assist with our space program.  What emerges from this book is convincing new evidence for a clandestine alien liaison program."

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

POSTSCRIPT COMMENT FROM L.W.B. (14 AUG 11):

== The Nakedness of NASA's FOIA Empress (See Items 2.36 and 2.18) ==

Too many federal agencies view the U. S. Freedom of Information Act as a toy by which they can play games with the inquiring public.

One of these offenders - if not the top one - happens to be the U. S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (see Items 2.117 and 2.116).  Of course, the NASA managerial hierarchy would have you believe otherwise, especially via its recently issued "open government" mission statement with its (alleged) solicitous interface with the general public.  Neither I nor you nor UFO-E.T.-disclosure lobbyist Stephen Bassett can (or should) stomach this latest NASA ruse being mounted against the public's common-sense appraisal of NASA's true FOIA responsiveness. 

Now spearheading a project to observe July 8th of each sequential year as World [E.T.] Disclosure Day (see http://worlddisclosureday.org ), Steve Bassett has exposed NASA's (damage control?) e-publication of its allegedly user-friendly approach to "open government" access to its record systems.  Here's an excerpt:

"'NASA is committed to experimenting with and embracing new participatory ways of collaborating,' said Linda Cureton, the agency's chief information officer.  'The launch of open.nasa is a new chapter in NASA's culture of openness and an exciting new way to engage citizens in our activities.'"

Contrast Cureton's theoretical FOIAtruth manifesto with the behind-the-scenes behavior typified by NASA's response to journalist Leslie Kean's quest for NASA records on the famous 1980 UFO-crash-landing/retrieval case in Kecksburg, Penn.  There, she was met with stonewalling delays in the processing of her FOIA request and with the agency's proffering of reams of unresponsive records in a red-herring attempt to discourage her probing.  Kean's prevailing in the resultant 2003 lawsuit proved the futility of that gamesmanship - at the unnecessary expense, alas, of the U. S. taxpayers.  Do you suppose that any of the officials associated with that FOIA-thwarting are still in NASA's employ?

That same tactic - now an art form within such agencies as NASA and CIA - confronted me when I FOIA-requested all NASA records pertaining to the Oglesby case.  (The FOIA office at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral never responded to my Feb. 13, 2009, FOIA request (No. FOIA-09-HQ-F-0081), which NASA headquarters allegedly had forwarded to them for processing; for this reason, I'm e-forwarding to NASA FOIA chief Jessica L. Bowen the contents of this comment with the request that she apply to it the principles of NASA's Open Access manifesto.)

What's a hapless FOIA requester to do about NASA's hypocritical handling of its "open government" obligation/practices?

Perhaps the answer lies in the late anthropologist Margaret Mead's famous declaration:  "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

I submit that such a small - but nevertheless highly effective - group would consist of selected whistleblowers armed with critical knowledge of NASA's deception and misfeasance - and courageous enough to (finally) share that knowledge with the public (perhaps on World Disclosure Day?).
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

Item 2.118: FOIA Request to CIA re FBIS-collected UFO-encounter Reports

TO:  Ms. Susan Viscuso
        Freedom-of-Information Coordinator
        U. S. Central Intelligence Agency
        Washington, DC  20505

FROM:  Larry W. Bryant
              3518 Martha Custis Drive
              Alexandria, VA  22302

DATE:  August 12, 2011

1.  Reference:  my announcement advertisement posted upon the web site of http://www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad5237181.htm - the text of which is printed at the bottom of this e-letter.

2.  In my capacity as a representative of the news media (RNM), principally as a columnist for the newsstand periodical UFO Magazine, I hereby submit this e-letter as a written FOIA request that you send me a photocopy of the following CIA-generated records - and that you acknowledge my RNM-requester status by waiving all records-search/review fees incident to your processing this request:  All UFO-related reports collected from foreign-press sources by your agency's Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) during the period May 1, 2011, through August 12, 2011.

3.  By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for UFO Magazine

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine

Chief of Staff, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

== Blow the Whistle on the CIA's Collection of UFO-E.T. Data ! ==
 
After decades of protesting that it has no formal investigatory role vis-a-vis UFO-E.T. reality, is the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency still collecting evidence of UFO encounters reported in foreign press accounts?  Count on it!  You see, the agency's Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) continues to cull from various news media abroad any number of cases (particularly military-connected ones) for . . . what - covert analysis and clandestine response?

Historically, the agency grudgingly has granted freedom-of-information access to some of those cases.  But - get this - the agency has yet to routinely publish them on its public web site; wouldn't this be a simple, pro-active task to undertake inasmuch as the high popularity of UFO-related web sites remains undisputed?  What will it take for this paradigm shift to occur in our lifetime - an act of Congress? (Stay tuned.)

Meantime, I'm FOIA-requesting that the agency send me a photocopy of all its FBIS-collected UFO-encounter reports during the UFOhot period of May 1, 2011, through August 12, 2011.  (See the request's text posted as Item 2.118 of my blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com .)

This protracted citizens-access process could be dispensed with were one or more whistleblowers within the agency to provide us automatic, timely release of the sought-for FBIS-collected entries.  After all, our tax dollars pay for this data-collection effort, so why shouldn't we have full share of its outcome?  If you (or someone you know) thus can acknowledge the public's stakeholdership in this matter (via "leaked" evidence or insider-revealed leads/tips), please contact me at:  Larry W. Bryant, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA  22302; phone: 703-931-3341; e-mail:  overtci@cavtel.net; or via subscribing for my free online newsletter at http://tinyletter.com/ufoview-updates .  

Item 2.117: Appeal of NASA's Adverse Determinations in FOIA Case No. 11-HQ-F-00873/11-JPL-F-01009 (Now Designated as 11-HQ-F-01037) (See Item 2.116)

TO:  Administrator
        ATTN:  FOIA Appeals Manager
        U. S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
        Mail Stop:  FOIA, Room 9R17
        Washington, DC  20546-0005

FROM:  Larry W. Bryant
               3518 Martha Custis Drive
               Alexandria, VA  22302

DATE:  August 5, 2011

1.  References:

     a.  The entire contents of the NASA case file identified in the subject line of this letter (as sent to me on Aug. 1, 2011, by your headquarters FOIA officer, Jessica L. Bowen);

     b.  My July 30, 2011, letter to Ms. Bowen (now posted as Item 2.116 upon my web log ( http://ufoview.posterous.com );

     c.  The FOIA lawsuit of Kean v. NASA (the Dec. 9, 2003, complaint of which is posted at http://www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf ; and a summary of which is posted at http://www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/nasa_lawsuit_conclusion.pdf - as regards the Dec. 9, 1965, UFO-crash-landing  retrieval in Kecksburg, Penn.). 

2.  This appeal relies on, and reiterates, the rationale expressed in reference 1b (and documented by its enclosures).  I hereby extend that rationale by pointing out that Mr. McMoneagle's remote-viewing session at issue was attended by Dr. Hal Puthoff of SRI International's now-defunct Project Stargate (who'd furnished the geographic coordinates for the session) and by former U. S. Army RV facilitator-instructor F. Holmes "Skip" Atwater (see his summary of the Monroe Institute-based session at http://satwater.www9.50megs.com/mars.htm ).  Accordingly, I ask that you add their names/organizations to the list of records-search-term criteria presented in my clarification e-note of June 23, 2011.

3.  As he admits in his July 14, 2011, e-message to Miriam Brown-Lam, JPL FOIA manager Dennis B. Mahon's July 13 denial of my "representative of the news media" (RNM) status continues to hold hostage any further processing of my May 14, 2011, FOIA request.  This extortionate action on its face violates my RNM right to full waiver of any records-search/review fees plus my right to good faith handling of my request.  What's more, it is disingenuous, at best, for Ms. Bowen to pronounce your agency's inability to mount a formal search for the requested records when, in his July 14, 2011, e-message to Bowen, Mr. Mahon admits to having conducted 2.5 hours of (cursory?) search time in this case.

4.  The history of this case mirrors your agency's unconscionable behavior documented in reference 1c, which resulted in needless litigation expense to the U. S. taxpayers. Now, do you dare repeat that unwise course of action here; or do you acknowledge, finally, my right of access to a reasonable records search and my right to full RNM waiver of any fees incident to that search?

5.  Please grant this appeal by promptly rescinding Mr. Mahon's denial of my RNM status and by proceeding with the necessary records search in good faith and due diligence.

6.  By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed print-out of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for UFO Magazine

Enclosure:  Copy of LWB's July 30, 2011, letter to Ms. Bowen (with its photo-copied excerpts from UFO Magazine No. 155)

P.S.:  NASA readily can send reconnaissance craft to Martian environs but has no managerial expertise/resources to conduct a computerized search of its contracts data base via any term besides "contract number."  Who knew!?

Copies furnished to:

    Editor, UFO Magazine