Item 4.3: Book Review of "Project Beta"

(Originally published (as a shortened version) in -- and copyrighted by -- the April 2005 issue of the monthly newsstand magazine FATE (http://www.fatemag.com )

By Larry W. Bryant

== Project Beta: The Story of Paul Bennewitz, National Security, and the Creation of a Modern UFO Myth," by Greg Bishop (Paraview Pocket Books (New York); 2005, softcover, 278 pages) ==

Perhaps I'm the wrong person to write this review; instead of me, maybe
it should be one of the book's key players. William L. Moore, for
example, or Linda Moulton Howe?

By scanning this book's index, the seasoned UFOlogist will find, along
with those two luminaries in UFOlogy, at least two dozen other familiar
names. Some of them have passed from the scene, either literally or
figuratively. Others, like Moore and Howe, remain with us in
body/mind/spirit -- like a benign patch of mold, mostly out of sight but
still simmering behind the barber shop's back-room curtain, emitting a
faint odor of its presence.

Suddenly, as we wait our hypothetical turn for a haircut, the odor
intensifies, for a previous customer has departed the shop and left his
copy of Bishop's expose lying in a now-vacant chair. Let's continue our
fantasy by picking it up quickly, before its owner returns for it.

As UFO-history tomes go, this one's definitely destined for
Collectorsville. One would hope that, en route to there, its author will
embark upon a sequel and thereby achieve an even greater sense of
fulfillment for his unenviable task of piecing together this
puzzle-within-a-puzzle. So, let's also hope that the current edition
will help smoke out even more participants in, and witnesses to, the
Bennewitz Affair.

This painstaking chronicle of the events, principals, and aftermath of a
case that sometimes makes a Dean Koontz novel seem almost tame epitomizes
the expression "posing more questions than it answers." Even so, the
journey down this dimly lit tunnel will become a milestone in anyone's
experience with UFO literature. Bishop's insightful, patient prose tries
to light the way as best it can, given the various externally imposed
loose ends of his research. (E.g., he's met with total rejection from
the late Bennewitz's survivors whenever he sought interviews with them.)

When you consider all the interactive intrigue, official deception,
private-agenda scenarios, mind-gamesmanship, and sociopolitical paranoia
that generated and fueled the Bennewitz Affair, you cannot but come up
with this evolving case study in how Murphy's Law can dominate the field
of UFO research. What's more, from this study we can extrapolate a
practical, near-invincible model for such activity whenever we encounter
a particular societal crisis. For example, look at how, because of our
secrecy-prone, deception-happy central government, certain areas of the
Internet abound in conspiracy-mongering as to what really caused (or
didn't cause) the explosion at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

In Bishop's hands, the plight of electrical physicist Paul Bennewitz
becomes, in UFOlogy, the ultimate case of "be careful what you wish for,
you just might get it!" In helping deliver "it" to Paul, back in the
eighties, UFO researcher Bill Moore gets "it," too -- by entering into a
Faustian pact with certain counterintelligence officials based at
Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.

The pact consists of the USAF Office of Special Investigations' having
Moore befriend (and eventually deceive) Bennewitz's frenzied efforts to
counter what the latter views as invasive activity perpetrated near
Kirtland by space aliens based in nearby cavernous hideaways. How does
Paul reach his conclusion? Simply via his array of home-built/operated
eavesdropping devices focused on mysteriously emitted low-frequency radio
signals near this high-security base housing multiple defense projects of
deep sensitivity.

In thus helping OSI-ers divert Bennewitz from getting too close to those
sensitive projects, Moore in return gets the promise of receiving
heretofore unreleased official evidence of UFO reality. Hard to pass up
such an offer -- right, Bill (or: right, a decade later, Linda Howe --
via a similar pact)? And, in the end, it becomes a little difficult to
sort out all the winners and losers in this drama of competing interests.

But we do know that the main loser, Bennewitz, becomes both the unsung
hero and the inevitable victim of his own story. Indeed, the author
dedicates the book, "To Paul Bennewitz." The book's appendix --
consisting of Bennewitz's final draft of his "Project Beta" report
(recounting his conclusions and recommendations about the allegedly
growing threat posed by the perceived alien menace) -- provides us all
the evidence we need that the OSI plan to defuse Bennewitz's (unintended)
threat to Kirtland's security surpassed all expectations of success -- at
the expense, naturally, of Bennewitz's winding up in an Albuquerque
mental ward for several months' treatment.

In such an anarchic field as UFOlogy, everyone has to make his own
mistakes -- and to try to learn from them promptly. Bishop's narrative
amply shows us how the Bennewitz Affair fits that axiom. His
interweaving of a few key examples of the official disinformationalists'
modus operandi serves as a tutorial that we current and future
researchers ought to cut-and-paste into an e-mail message to ourselves
(subject: "Avoiding the Pitfalls of the USAF Disinfo Wizards").

What's this!? -- here comes back into the barber shop that earlier
customer, making a beeline toward the vacant chair, in search of his
book. He bears a striking resemblance to -- yikes! -- one Special Agent
Richard Doty of USAF-OSI fame/infamy. My greeting: "Care to write a
review of this book for FATE magazine, Rick?"

Item 3.10: The Academic Pay Dirt in UFO Research

(From the January 2007 issue of UFO Magazine; pages 20 and 21 of which are mislabeled "December 2006")

By Larry W. Bryant

[Author's note:  I delivered this address at a meeting of the Jefferson Literary and Debating Society at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, March 7, 1997.]

An old friend of mine delighted in recounting this observation from Winston Churchill as regards the three hardest things for a man to do:  The first is to climb a wall that's leaning toward him; the second is to kiss a woman who's leaning away from him; and the third of these most difficult things for a man to do, according to Churchill, is to give a good after-dinner speech.

Well, thanks to this evening's hospitality from your fellow students Arun, Margaret, and Scott, I expect not too much difficulty tonight. And I especially salute Scott Tumperi for volunteering to pose as our federal government's chief executive in delivering to you my draft of a "Presidential Statement on UFO Reality." The stage behind me, with its Oval Office-style chair, ought to serve well for this purpose. But, first, let me read to you a few letters sent to me by students somewhat younger than you:

* "My name is Jay ______. I go to South School in Somerset, Mass., and I am in Mrs. ______ 's Grade 4. I am in an independent study group called Spectrum. Spectrum students can pick any topic to study, and they have to get all the information and anything else they need on their own. My Spectrum topic is UFO's and life on other planets. Could you please help me learn more about UFO's? I can't go to all the UFO conferences because they cost too much. I hope you can help me. Please send me any information or anything you can about UFO sightings, pictures, types of aliens, abductions, mutilations and what the government is doing about these things. At the end of the semester all the Spectrum students have a special showcase of their topics presented to the public. Not everyone believes me about UFO's. I want to show them we are not alone in this universe and to be aware of the work going on to solve the UFO mystery."

* "Hello, my name is Brian _____. I am a 15-year-old sophomore at Penn Cambria High School (Lilly, Pa.). I have an upcoming term paper for my English II class. I have decided to do my paper on the Roswell incident. I was wondering if it would be possible for you to send me any information concerning this topic. I knew that due to the controversial views on Roswell that anything I found in a textbook or encyclopedia would be very limited and insufficient. Thank you for your time and consideration, and Godspeed."

* "I am a junior in high school, and I am currently working on a semester research project about extraterrestrials, unidentified flying objects, and alien encounters. I have chosen this topic because I am convinced that we're not the only ones out here, and I wish to learn more about our neighbors. I would appreciate any reference material you could send me on these subjects. I would also like to be able to contact a club member for a written interview in the form of a questionnaire. I would enjoy talking with any members in the south Texas area if possible, and I know my class would love a visit by such a person. Thank you for your time. I know that with your help I can produce an excellent report."


* "I am writing a research paper on the deception the United States Government has committed to its citizens in regards to UFOs. I am searching for information on this topic. If you would be able to send me any information, it would be a tremendous help. Thank you for your time."

* "Hello, my name is Matt ______. I am thirteen and go to Rock Lake Middle School in Longwood, Fla. In my history class we are doing a debate on various topics. A friend and I choose to do one on paranormal phenomena. We are going against two other classmates. We say that paranormal phenomena doesn't exist and the government is not covering it up; our opponents are saying the opposite. If you can please send me any proof that paranormal phenomena doesn't exist I am sure it could help us out majorly. Good luck to you and your members, and please try not to forget."


These letters, and dozens like them coming to me every year, would try the patience of the late physicist Edward U. Condon. In his latter days at the University of Colorado, he headed a team of researchers commissioned by the U.S. Air Force in 1966 to conduct a Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects. Three years later, his formal report had this to say: "We strongly recommend that teachers refrain from giving students credit for school work based on their reading of the presently available UFO books and magazine articles." Condon simply felt that the current commercial literature was too sensationalized and fraught with scientifically unsound material. Nevertheless, as we've seen, teachers and students continue to be drawn to the mystery of reported UFO encounters, and to the issue of official secrecy as regards reports processed through official channels.
One of Dr. Condon's conclusions concerned this very issue: one that remains at the forefront almost 30 years later: "It has been contended that the subject has been shrouded in official secrecy. We conclude otherwise. We have no evidence of secrecy concerning UFO reports. What has been miscalled secrecy has been no more than an intelligent policy of delay in releasing data so that the public does not become confused by premature publication of incomplete studies and reports."

Perhaps Condon had been duped by his own lack of access to the hard-core UFO data beyond the contents of the USAF Project Blue Book. Consider the Bolender Memorandum of Oct. 20, 1969: "Reports of unidentified flying objects which could affect national security are made in accordance with Joint Army-Navy-Air Publication 146 or Air Force Manual 55-11, and are not part of the Blue Book system. Brig. Gen. C. H. Bolender was noting this distinction in his role as a top USAF research-and-development specialist at the Pentagon.

One of the USAF documents to which Condon had no access consists of a then TOP SECRET sighting report dealing with U.S. Sen. Richard Russell. Back on Oct. 4, 1956, the then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee was on a train trip through the Soviet Union, along with a military advisor and a committee consultant. They witnessed two classic "flying saucers" maneuvering not far from the railroad track. In their subsequent intelligence debriefing, the Army lieutenant colonel said, "We've been told for years that there isn't such a thing but all of us saw it, including Sen. Russell."

And, what would Condon have said about the UFO-related term papers produced in the late sixties/early seventies by several Air Force officers attending advanced studies at the Air University in Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala.? At least one or two of these thesis-level papers gave critical marks to the Air Force's public handling of the UFO Problem.

Next, how about the several Ph.D. dissertations that sprang up shortly after the Blue Book heyday? One of these -- by Dr. David Jacobs, now a historian at Temple University -- went into popular publication under the title: "The UFO Controversy in America." He later focused his research on the so-called alien-abduction phenomenon.

Condon would better have served the interests of objectivity had he read the 1967 book by journalist Mort Young, titled "UFO: Top Secret." In it Young makes this telling observation, which holds true today: "Because all UFO material is supposedly available to the public, the field of inquiry is open to every citizen of the United States. Yet when the government is contacted and asked about UFO's, the knowledge gained is not about UFO's, but about how the government really operates day to day."


Which brings us to how you and your fellow students can help resolve the UFO problem while at the same time enhance your chosen careers. One need not have a college degree to become a UFO investigator, but it certainly helps. This field of research draws upon science as a tool, not as a dogma. So here are some disciplines that can help you contribute to what UFO researchers are trying to do:

* The hard sciences: physics, math, chemistry, astronomy, geology, biology, forensic medicine, engineering.


* The social sciences: psychology, sociology, political science.

* Law enforcement and legal studies.

* Philosophy, religion, anthropology.

Any or all this academic preparation can equip you with the knowledge and experience necessary for conducting serious, objective, fruitful UFO research. For example, the training offered by journalism and law enforcement can provide a good foundation for interviewing UFO witnesses and for evaluating their accounts. And consider the symbiosis that develops: the more you get involved in UFO research, the more you put into practice the classroom knowledge and skills you've been working so hard to acquire. A win-win situation for your chosen profession and for the future of UFOlogy. By choosing to enter this field as a volunteer in field investigation, in report writing, in physical-trace analysis, in photo-interpretation, in consulting on technical matters and language translation, or in library science, for example, you can write your own ticket for such opportunities as --

* Travel to UFO hot spots worldwide;

* Retrieving and analyzing official UFO documentation;

* Producing oral-history case studies;

* Publishing newsletters;

* Taking part in political activism to promote greater freedom of official UFO information;

* Assessing UFO-related cultural response of government agencies, legislative bodies, military organizations, corporate leaders, and the news media.

Now, how about the challenges you'll be facing when you embark upon UFO research? Here are some of them:

* Non-cooperation on the part of organized science and academia. Exhort these critics to rise from their easy chairs to look beyond the horizon of their own bias.

* Undue secrecy, deception, or outright lying on the part of government officials in charge of controlling access to official UFO data. Just remember: the public has a right to know, and the government has a duty to tell.

* Hoaxes, rumor-mongering, and commercial opportunism on the part of some unscrupulous persons. This includes some of the tabloid accounts you see at the supermarket stand. With practice you'll learn how to recognize, and fend off, this distraction.

* The denial-and-ridicule factor, asserting that UFO research wastes time and resources, and that you ought to be ashamed of giving serious thought to any reported UFO encounter. Here, let the evidence, along with your best effort, speak for itself.

You can meet these challenges the same way I have: through perseverance, honesty, and the knowledge that pioneers throughout history from Louis Pasteur to Alexander Graham Bell have had to deal with the same kind of impediments to progress. Accept both the challenges and the opportunities as part of your journey toward solving the UFO mystery. When you thus give of your talent, your education, and your passion for learning, you will have helped develop the academic pay dirt in UFO research.

Now, I have a final reference to Winston Churchill. He said: "We make a living -- by what we get, but we make a life by what we give."

[Author's postscript:   UFO Magazine's publication of this piece cannot help institutionalizing it for decades to come, in that it can serve as a springboard for any high school or college student tempted to add her own inclinations and investigatory talents to the pursuit of UFOtruth.

Maybe some day one or more of these budding scholars will stand before the lectern of the prestigious Jefferson Literary and Debating Society ( http://www.jeffersonsociety.org ) to echo and expand upon the sentiments of this UFOlogical siren song.  Incidentally, the proposed "Presidential Statement on UFO Reality" now appears as an appendix to the Galde Press edition of my 2006 book "UFO Politics at the White House:  Citizens Rally 'round Jimmy Carter's Promise."]

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Larry W. Bryant directs the Washington, D. C., office of the public-interest group Citizens Against UFO Secrecy.  His book "UFO Politics at the White House:  Citizens Rally 'round Jimmy Carter's Promise" is available from Galde Press, Inc., http://www.galdepress.com .  He welcomes communication from the public at his e-mail address:  overtci@cavtel.net .

Item 2.7: Larry W. Bryant's Formal Statement of Support for Denver's Extra Campaign ( http://www.extracampaign.org )

In our decades-long pursuit of UFO-E.T. Truth, we planetary citizens have the right not to be lied to by our elected and appointed officials.

In this regard, too often have some of those official insiders resorted to depriving us of our stakeholdership in what various world governments have learned about UFO-E.T. reality and in where (and why) they're suppressing that knowledge.

Now, finally, with the advent of the Denver-voters campaign to pass an ordinance for operating in that city an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission, we have a codified opportunity to reverse officialdom's stranglehold on UFO-E.T. Truth.

Let's seize this moment in history and apply it toward exponential advancement of UFO-E.T. awareness among all citizens of Earth. -- LARRY W. BRYANT (16 Aug 08); Director, Washington, D. C., Office of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy [see his blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com ]

[Editorial note: for a news analysis of the Denver project's debut, see Bryant's column in the June 2008 issue of "UFO Magazine."]

Item 2.6: FOIA Request re CIA UFO Cover-up

TO: Freedom of Information Manager
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Washington, DC 20511

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302

DATE: August 13, 2008

John J. Callahan -- a retired U. S. Federal Aviation Administration official (and now also one of several recent UFO-cover-up whistleblowers) -- has publicly revealed his and other FAA employees' participation in a 1987 special meeting at FAA headquarters in Washington, D. C., to discuss and evaluate certain official evidence of the intrusive UFO encounter experienced on Nov. 17, 1986, by the Japanese flight crew (No. 1628) of a 747 cargo jet during that night in Alaskan sky. Also taking part in the 1987 meeting were representatives from President Reagan's scientific staff and three personnel from the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency. At the meeting's conclusion, one of the CIA attenders announced, "This event never happened; we were never here; we're confiscating all this data . . .."

Accordingly, I hereby request that you furnish me a copy of the following CIA-received and CIA-generated records:

(1) As pertain to the convening, attendance roster, briefings, minutes, and all other related documentation of the above-identified meeting;

(2) As pertain to all other similar cases of airborne UFO encounters reportedly occurring since Nov. 17, 1986, to date.

Since I submit this request as a representative of the news media (principally as a columnist for the monthly newsstand periodical "UFO Magazine"), I ask that you waive all records-search/review fees incident to your fulfilling this request. For a sampling of my free-lance publication credits, see the author's blog at http://ufoview.posterous.com .

By snail-mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.


LARRY W. BRYANT
Director, Washington, D. C., Office of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine

Chairman, Select Committee on Intelligence, U. S. Senate

Chairman, Committee on Science and Technology, U. S. House of Representatives

Item 3.9: Corso's Curse

(Originally published in the July 2006 issue of UFO Magazine)

By Larry W. Bryant

"'It will be,' [1950's-era USAF chief of staff] General Twining said, 'a case where the cover-up is the disclosure and the disclosure is the cover-up.'" -- As quoted by the late Army Lt. Col. Philip J. Corso in his 1997 memoirs "The Day After Roswell," co-authored by William J. Birnes

As with scores of other Roswell Incident insiders, Philip J. Corso lost the race with the undertaker; but just barely -- for Corso's Roswellian legacy and its modern aftermath won't ever bite the dust of benign neglect.

Yes, ironically, his loss is becoming the body politic's self-perpetuating victory, as a sort of curse against those keepers of the Deepest Secret who feel we have no right to know -- and to confirm -- the full story as to how certain allegedly alien spacecraft debris journeyed, in July 1947, from desolate New Mexico ranch land to a new, cloned life amidst the high-tech devices that today's consumerism takes for granted: perfected devices owing their existence to the Corso-orchestrated, covert transfer to selected U. S. industrial giants of various "hardware from elsewhere," ranging from my little iMac's computer-chip circuits to Army helicopter aviators' night-vision goggles.

When UFOmagazine publisher and Corso's co-author William J. Birnes learned of my planned Corso-redux column, he e-mailed me the following capsulization of the Curse of Corso:

"In Corso's case, his advantage for [Gen. Arthur] Trudeau was that he was low-level and could fly below the radar. He was in Army R&D at the foreign technology desk for about 30 days and then essentially disappeared. He said that he became Trudeau's deputy. Actually, he became more of a courier, delivering Trudeau's messages to the industrial people that the Army wanted to fund. His wasn't an espionage or spy mission as much as it was a cover mission to get alien technology into the hands of mainstream defense industry engineers."

Specifically, Birnes was responding to my brand-new series of freedom-of-information foraging into how certain federal agencies view the image of UFO-E.T. reality revealed by the Trudeau-Corso team of intelligence/R&D experts (see sidebars for the related correspondence). You see, back in 1998, I'd embarked on a mission to acquire all relevant agency dossiers on Corso's activities, associations, and motivations. The Federal Bureau of Investigation coughed up a few dozen pages of documentation, some of it painting a less-than-rosy picture of the Corso persona.

Likewise, the FOIA folks at the U. S. Army Intelligence and Security Command at Fort Meade, Md., produced a modicum of previously unreleased documentation while (curiously) being unable to come up with Corso's DD Form 398 (Personal History Statement) summarizing the background events by which his application for a TOP SECRET security clearance was processed. (Note: From the Army's military personnel records center in St. Louis, I'd already received a copy of Corso's DA Form 66 (Officer Record Brief) logging his career-long assignment-and-training experience.)

But, when I queried the always-cagey FOIA office at the Central Intelligence Agency in Washington, I hit a major snag: since Corso was still alive in early 1998, the Agency felt obliged to notify me that they'd need to have a privacy-release form from him in order to fully produce any "responsive records"; plus: they refused to grant me a waiver of all records-search fees incident to their processing my request. As to the former impasse, Corso never got around to furnishing me a signed release form (did he fear I'd find some derogatory data in his CIA dossier?); as to the latter impasse, my appeal of their fee-waiver denial failed -- casting me as yet another casualty in the 60-year-old UFOinfowar, and earning the Agency additional points in its relentless march toward winning the 2006 Rosemary Award presented by the public-interest group National Security Archive (housed at The George Washington University -- see: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/ ).

But, now with the passage of eight years (including Corso's death and my elevation to the columnar pages of this 20-year-old magazine), perhaps my literary corpse may rise from its premature burial to, once again (in the Agency's own words echoed by a FOIA-freed-up Aug. 14, 1973, memo), remind the Agency that they've "not heard the last from Mr. Bryant." (Refer, again, to the sidebar reproducing my May 4, 2006, FOIA request to the Agency.)

Had Corso cheated the undertaker by living for, say, eight more productive years, certain political events might have intervened to thwart his progress in helping tell the greatest story ever never told. For example, the Bush regime's penchant for excessive secrecy and for retaliatory action against whistleblowers not only would stifle Corso's further efforts toward exposing the Deepest Secret; its chilling effect also would close the access-and-accountability door via such Draconian measures as the recent bill drafted by Congress to discourage/punish leaks of classified information (even, presumably, information revealing serious wrongdoing by officialdom). As reported in the April 27, 2006, issue of "Dissent is Patriotic" (the e-newsletter published by the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, headquartered in Northampton, Mass. -- http://www.bordc.org ), here's what might confront today's Corso and his cohorts in Truth-telling:

"The House of Representatives votes this week on an Intelligence bill that includes a little-known provision that would revoke pensions for intelligence employees who make unauthorized disclosures, and it would give arrest powers to CIA and NSA security forces. It's part of the CIA crackdown on government leaks, and opens the door for these international [and intra-Cosmos? -- LWB] spy agencies to conduct domestic intelligence gathering. Critics call the plan a step backwards, towards 'Nixon-era abuses.'"

The eternal paper chase inspired by Corso's bold expose of the Ultimate Cover-up now has become reenergized with my dispatch of a follow-up FOIA request to the INSCOM headquarters at Fort Meade (see the sidebar reproduction of my letter of May 7, 2006). This renewed quest for official Corso-ana centers on a bit of correspondence FOIA-released to me in 1998 by the INSCOM FOIA office. A woman whose name has been redacted from that material had sought from pertinent Army officials an investigation into whether Corso's published revelations amount to a breach of national security. In effect, the woman demanded to know: "Assuming that Corso has violated his secrecy oath, what are you guys going to do about it?" Well, Ms. Mystery Woman, we guys and gals here at UFO Magazine want to know their answer -- and more -- too. For starters, where are the records (and what do they say?) pertaining to any such investigation? If the Army chose not to investigate such a serious prospect, then does this inaction mean that ALL future UFO-coverup whistleblowers now have a free pass to reveal THEIR behind-the-curtain experiences and corroborative evidence? By continuing their inaction, are pertinent Army officials committing dereliction of a duty that we taxpayers pay them to perform? If so, shouldn't we be asking our congresscritters to investigate the investigators in this matter? (If you do write to your representative or a senator about this issue, please enclose a photocopy of this column -- and share their responses with me.)

If either the Army or the CIA insists on falling on its Sword of Denial by dishonoring my requester status as a "representative of the news media," then they should find no surprise in learning that my attorney is awaiting receipt of my retainer fee for his services toward challenging that denial in federal court.

Meantime, as we endure the snail pace of FOIA processing, let's pay unsilent tribute to the immortal Curse of Corso -- that self-described little man from a small town in western Pennsylvania who rose to majestic heights with a story still unfolding.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

SIDEBAR NO. 1:

TO: Chief, Department of the Army Control Office
Attention: DAMI-CIC-CC (Counterintelligence Operations)
Fort George G. Mead, MD 20755-5975

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302

DATE: May 7, 2006

When the late Lt. Col. Philip James Corso (U. S. Army - Retired) published his memoirs in 1997 (The Day After Roswell; Pocket Books), he revealed his role, circa 1961-63, in coordinating the U. S. Army/Air Force/Navy's technological exploitation of certain artifacts retrieved from the debris of a crash-landed "flying saucer" on ranch land near Roswell, N. M.

Because of that revelation (and related ones), a woman wrote to several military officials to express her concern that Corso's book constitutes the transmittal of highly classified national-security information to persons not officially authorized to receive, possess, and/or disseminate it for further public consumption. Of course, Corso, in his former role as a senior Army-intelligence and research-and-development analyst, may have viewed his "leakage" as nothing more than his belated exercise of declassification authority (assuming that he had possessed pertinent original-classification authority -- a rationalization mirroring that of President Bush's leakage of the Valerie Plame CIA information).

At any rate, as an independent writer focusing on national-security affairs (including the politics of UFOlogy), I want to help the public resolve all issues about Corso's conduct, associations, motivations, and accountability in this matter. In doing so, I hereby submit this letter as a formal, written freedom-of-information request that you send me a copy of all INSCOM-generated and INSCOM-received records pertaining to your command's response to the above-cited woman's notification letter (whose text is quoted below) -- said records to include any and all reports-of-investigation, transcripts of interviews, counterintelligence assessments, wiretapping authorizations and transcripts, physical-search warrants, surveillance reports, after-action reports, damage-control planning documents, and all related correspondence, memoranda for record, briefing papers, and minutes of meetings.

Since I submit this request as a "representative of the news media" in my capacity as a columnist for the newsstand periodical UFO Magazine, I ask that you waive all records-search fees incident to your fulfilling this request.

By snail-mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.


LARRY W. BRYANT

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine

Chairman, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

TEXT OF THE SUBJECT NOTIFICATION LETTER OF MAY 29, 1997:

Commander
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
ATTN: Investigative Services
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060

Dear Commander:

By his own admission in his book "The Day After Roswell," Army Lt. Col. (Ret.) Philip J. Corso (see enclosed material) has been publicly revealing information obtained during the course of his R&D/intelligence work on highly classified projects and programs at the Pentagon during 1961--63. He cites no official clearance or legal authority for making these revelations about the Army's possession of certain artifacts and analyses generated by crash-landed "flying saucers" during the period 1947--74.

Therefore, I ask that your command investigate and report on the extent to which Corso's revelations constitute a breach of national security, and to explain to me what action the Army plans to take upon finding that he thus has shared classified information with persons unauthorized to receive it.

Sincerely,

[Notifier's identity was redacted in 1998 by the INSCOM FOIA office. -- L.W.B.]

Cc's to --

Director of Communications, Pocket Books (New York)
Commander, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (Fort Belvoir)
Director, Defense Intelligence Agency (Washington)
Commander, U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (Bolling AFB, D.C.)
Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Headquarters, Department of the Air Force (the
Pentagon)
Director, Office of Naval Intelligence (the Pentagon)
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (Washington)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

SIDEBAR NO. 2:

TO: Director
U. S. Central Intelligence Agency
ATTN: Information and Privacy Coordinator
Washington, DC 20505

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302

DATE: May 4, 2006

In his 1997 book "The Day After Roswell," UFO-coverup whistleblower Philip James Corso (Social Security No.: 194-01-8316; born: May 22, 1915; died: July 16, 1998 -- see enclosed copy of his obituary from the newsletter of the International UFO Museum and Research Center at Roswell, N.M.) recounts, in chapter 10 ("The U2 Program and Project Corona: Spies in Space"), how the CIA-managed, covert U2 flights over the Soviet Union were helping CIA analysts learn "about the Russian air defense system at the same time they were surveilling possible areas of alien spacecraft activity."

That revelation, coming as it does from a former, senior U. S. Army intelligence officer with a history of highly sensitive contributions to U. S. national security, not only sheds laserlike light upon the policymaking decisions, operations, and activities of the federal government; it also places your agency at the center of the perennially renewed international discussion as to what certain U. S. officials know (and when they knew it) about UFO reality.

And the UFO-reality revelation happens to be not the only Corso-related interaction with CIA interests. Within the U. S. Federal Bureau of Investigation's formerly classified, FOIA-released dossier on Corso's activities, several passages pertain to CIA awareness of them. One of these (partially redacted) passages occurs in a Feb. 11, 1965, FBI memorandum addressed to FBI Assistant Director C. D. DeLoach by Special Agent M. A. Jones; it reads: ". . . and CIA characterized Corso as a parasite who has never produced any intelligence through his own efforts, but who has profited from information developed by hundreds of dedicated Government agents and investigators." In another paragraph of the same memo, Mr. Jones notes: "The [FBI] Director indicated he wanted the FBI kept out of the resulting dispute between G-2 [Army Intelligence] and CIA. (100-420468)."

Of course, the piece de resistance in the Corso legacy consists of his whistleblowing two-page affidavit filed in June 1998 in the U. S. District Court for the District of Arizona -- via Citizens Against UFO Secrecy v. Department of the Army (Civil Action No. 98-0538 PHX ROS). Here's the text of the affidavit:

"I, [Lt.] Col. Philip J. Corso, do hereby swear, under the penalties of perjury, that the following statements are true:

"That at all times hereinafter mentioned, I was a member and officer of the defendant.

"That during my tenure with the defendant I was a member of President Eisenhower's National Security Council and former head of the Foreign Technology Desk at defendant's Research & Development department.

"That on or about July 6, 1947, while stationed at Fort Riley, Kansas, I personally observed a four-foot non-human creature with bizarre-looking four-fingered hands, thin legs and feet, and an oversized incandescent-light-bulb-shaped head. The eye sockets were oversized and almond-shaped and pointed down to its tiny nose. The creature's skull was overgrown to the point where all its facial features were arranged frontally, occupying only a small circle on the lower part of the head. There were no eyebrows or any indications of facial hair. The creature had only a tiny flat slit for a mouth and it was completely closed, resembling more of a crease or indentation between the nose and the bottom of the chinless skull than a fully functioning orifice.

"That in 1961, I came into possession of what I refer to as the 'Roswell File.' This file contained field reports, medical autopsy reports and technological debris from the crash [of] an extraterrestrial vehicle in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.

"That I have personally read the medical autopsy reports which refer to the autopsy of the previously described creature that I saw in 1947 at Fort Riley, Kansas.

"That said autopsy reports indicated the autopsy was performed at Walter Reed [Army] Hospital, which was under the authority of the defendant at the time of the autopsy.

"That said autopsy report referred to the creature as an 'extraterrestrial biological entity.'"

Although the content of Corso's smoking-gun affidavit has yet to be echoed within the CIA's several hundred pages of UFO-related documentation already FOIA-released, or subject to future release/leakage, to the public, it nevertheless epitomizes (as do the "leaked," corroborative "Majestic-12" documents) the fact that the Roswell Incident remains the dead horse that never dies (or that never gets fully buried so long as whistleblowers of Corso's caliber keep surfacing and singing).

Assuming there exist any CIA-generated records pertaining (1) to Corso's activities during his days as, say, a research assistant in Sen. Strom Thurmond's office and/or (2) to the revelations in/aftermath of his memoirs (The Day After Roswell), I need to know -- and the public interest will benefit from my sharing that historical knowledge -- the contents of those records.

Accordingly, I hereby request, under terms of the U. S. Freedom of Information Act, that you send me a copy of all CIA-generated and CIA-received records pertaining to Lt. Col. Corso and his associations, activities, congressional testimony, and motivations.

Since I submit this request as an independent writer (and hence, in FOIA language, as a "representative of the news media") for such newsstand periodicals as FATE magazine and UFO magazine, I ask that you waive all records-search fees incident to your fulfilling this request.

By snail-mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.


LARRY W. BRYANT

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine ( http://www.ufomag.com )

Chairman, Committee on Government Reform - U. S. House of Representatives
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Larry W. Bryant directs the Washington, D. C., office of the public-interest group Citizens Against UFO Secrecy. His book "UFO Politics at the White House: Citizens Rally 'round Jimmy Carter's Promise" is available from Galde Press, Inc. ( http://www.galdepress.com ). He welcomes communication from the public at his e-mail address: overtci@cavtel.net .